SC Allows Revenue to Seek Review Before HC on Faceless Reassessment Notices Issued by JAO:

SC Allows Revenue to Seek Review Before HC on Faceless Reassessment Notices Issued by JAO

Court disposes batch of SLPs arising from Punjab & Haryana HC rulings quashing Section 148 notices issued outside faceless regime

Supreme Court Allows Revenue to Revisit HC Orders on Faceless Reassessment Notices

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 9, 2026
Last update on Feb 9, 2026
SC Allows Revenue to Seek Review Before HC on Faceless Reassessment Notices Issued by JAO The Income Tax Department filed a large batch of Special Leave Petitions challenging judgments of the Punjab & Haryana High Court which had quashed reassessment notices issued under Section 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers (JAOs).
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The High Court had held that after the introduction of Sections 144B and 151A and the e-Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022, reassessment proceedingsmust be conducted in a faceless manner and could not be initiated by JAOs. These rulings relied upon earlier decisions in Jasjit Singh v. Union of India and Jatinder Singh Bhangu v. Union of India, which had set aside such notices for lack of jurisdiction. Main Issue: Whether reassessment notices issued under Section 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers, instead of through the faceless mechanism mandated under Sections 144B and 151A, were legally sustainable. SC's Order: The Supreme Court disposed of all the Special Leave Petitions without adjudicating the merits. The Court permitted the Revenue to file applications before the respective High Courts in the already disposed writ petitions to bring on record a later statutory clarification proposed to be inserted with effect from 01.04.2021 in the Finance Act.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The High Courts were directed to consider such applications afresh after hearing both sides. Liberty was reserved to the aggrieved party to approach the Supreme Court again if unsuccessful. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…