ITAT Quashes PCIT’s Revision: Section 263 Cannot Override Valid 153D Approval in Search Assessments:

Tribunal Holds That Without First Annulling Statutory Approval Under Section 153D, PCIT Cannot Term Assessment Order as Erroneous
ITAT Quashes Section 263 Revision: PCIT Cannot Override Valid 153D Approval in 153C Assessments

ITAT Quashes PCIT’s Revision: Section 263 Cannot Override Valid 153D Approval in Search Assessments
Tarun Kumar Sahay (HUF) filed its return for AY 2016-17, declaring income of Rs. 2.11 lakh. Pursuant to a search under Section 132 on the Alankit Group in October 2019, proceedings under Section 153C were initiated against the assessee, culminating in an assessment order dated 04.03.2024 assessing income at Rs. 3.31 crore. The assessment was completed after obtaining mandatory approval under Section 153D from the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax.
While the assessee’s appeal was pending before the CIT(A), the Principal Commissioner invoked Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer had failed to examine certain issues and treating the Section 153C assessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The PCIT directed a fresh assessment.
Main Issue: Whether an assessment passed under Section 153C, after obtaining mandatory approval under Section 153D, can be revised under Section 263 without first holding the statutory approval itself to be erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue.
Tribunal Decided: The Delhi ITAT quashed the revision order. It held that approval under Section 153D is a statutory safeguard and an integral part of a valid search assessment. Once such approval is granted, the PCIT cannot indirectly set aside the assessment under Section 263 unless the approval itself is examined and found to be erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue.
Relying on PCIT v. Prakhar Developers Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal held that in the absence of any adverse finding on the Section 153D approval, assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was invalid. Thus, the revision order was quashed, and the assessee’s appeal was allowed.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








