Allahabad HC Upholds Natural Justice: No Mandatory GST Portal Check After Registration Cancellation:

Allahabad HC Upholds Natural Justice: No Mandatory GST Portal Check After Registration Cancellation

The Allahabad High Court held that after GST registration cancellation, taxpayers are not required to check the GST portal, and authorities must ensure proper service of notice before passing orders.

HC Says No Obligation to Monitor GST Portal Post Cancellation

authorSaloni KumaridateMar 18, 2026
Last update on Mar 18, 2026
Allahabad HC Upholds Natural Justice: No Mandatory GST Portal Check After Registration Cancellation The Allahabad High Court rules that in case the GST registration of a taxpayer is cancelled, he/she is not obliged to check the GST portal. In case the taxpayer does not visit the portal, the tax authorities should try other means to contact the taxpayer, as mentioned under Section 73 of the Act. M/S Manav Vikas Sewa Sansthan (through authorised signatory Suman Singh) has filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, challenging an order dated August 29, 2024, passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Sector-9, Lucknow B, under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act, 2017.
Allahabad High Court Quashes Tax Orders Over Violation of Natural Justice Principles
Previously, on December 28, 2021, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled, and after that, the petitioner did not continue his business further. The GST authorities had issued a show cause notice (SCN) addressed to the petitioner on the GST portal and subsequently passed the impugned order under Section 73 of the Act. In the hearing before the high court, the petitioner claimed that once the GST registration of a taxpayer is cancelled, he/she is not required to visit and check the GST portal. In such a case, the tax authorities should try to reach the taxpayer using alternative means like registered email, SMS alerts, or by sending physical notices at the resident's address, etc., as mandated under Section 169 of the CGST Act. To support this claim, the petitioner also cited an earlier ruling of the same court in the case titled M/s Katyal Industries Vs State of U.P. and others, with Neutral Citation No.2024:AHC:23697-DB, which also held in support of the aforementioned claim.
GST: When Section 47 Late Fee Is Already Paid, Additional Penalty U/s 125 Cannot Be Imposed, Says HC
When the court analysed the facts of the case, it noted that the principles of natural justice were violated in the present case since the petitioner was never heard before issuing the final order. Therefore, the court quashed the impugned order dated August 29, 2024, passed by the GST authorities. However, the GST department is still allowed to start the proceedings again from the start by issuing a fresh notice and serving the same to the petitioner through a proper means according to the law.

About Author

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2389
Up Next

Loading suggestions…