Allahabad High Court Waives Penalty Where GST Paid Under Wrong Head:

Allahabad High Court Waives Penalty Where GST Paid Under Wrong Head

IGST wrongly deposited as CGST and SGST cannot attract penalty when tax already with department

Allahabad HC: No Penalty When GST Paid Under Wrong Head

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 11, 2026
Last update on Feb 11, 2026
Allahabad High Court Waives Penalty Where GST Paid Under Wrong Head The petitioner, Siddiqui Transport Company through its proprietor Mr. Vanshi Dhar Gairola, challenged the order dated 25.04.2024 passed by the adjudicating authority and the appellate order dated 30.11.2024 affirming the same. The dispute arose after a show cause notice dated 23.12.2023 demanded tax of Rs. 1,42,495/-. The petitioner maintained that the tax amount had already been deposited; however, by mistake, the IGST liability was paid under the heads of CGST and SGST. It was also pointed out that the total amount deposited exceeded the demanded sum by Rs. 1,048/-.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The department did not dispute that the amount stood deposited, but contended that it had been paid under the wrong tax head. Despite this, penalty was imposed on the ground of non-payment of IGST. Issue before HC: Whether penalty and demand can be sustained when a tax liability has been discharged but mistakenly deposited under an incorrect GST head.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
HC's Ruling: The High Court held that the issue was squarely covered by the earlier ruling in Ocean E Mart. Since the tax amount had already been deposited with the department the same could not be treated as deliberate non-payment or tax evasion. The Court permitted the petitioner to deposit the amount under the correct IGST head within ten days. The authorities were directed to refund the amount earlier deposited under CGST and SGST within a further period of ten days, in accordance with law. The Court further clarified that as the mistake was not mala fide and the tax amount was already with the department, the petitioner would not be liable to pay any interest or penalty. Therefore, the impugned orders were set aside. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2161
Up Next

Loading suggestions…