High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation for Lack of Reasons and Hearing:

High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation for Lack of Reasons and Hearing

Cancellation order quashed as non-speaking and violative of Article 14; fresh adjudication directed

HC Quashes GST Registration Cancellation for Being Non-Speaking

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 11, 2026
Last update on Feb 11, 2026
High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation for Lack of Reasons and Hearing M/s M.S.K. Brick Field, through its proprietor Mohammad Shakeel Khan, challenged the order dated 05.03.2026 cancelling its GST registration under Section 29(2)(b) of the GST Act and the appellate order dated 06.01.2026 dismissing its appeal as time-barred. The petitioner contended that no opportunity of hearing was granted before cancellation and that the power under Section 29(2) was exercised mechanically without reasons. It was submitted that returns for two quarters of FY 2024-25 could not be filed due to severe illness and that the default was not intentional.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Main Issue: Whether the cancellation of GST registration without reasons and without granting an opportunity of hearing is legally sustainable when the appeal was dismissed solely on limitation. HC Ruled: The HC held that cancellation of registration, being a serious consequence affecting business rights, must be supported by reasons and should show application of mind, as earlier emphasised in M/s Chandra Sain v. Union of India.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The Court found that the cancellation order contained no reasons and was a non-speaking order, thus violating principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution. The appellate authority had also erred in dismissing the appeal merely on limitation without addressing the substantive grievance. Hence, both the cancellation order and the appellate order were quashed. The petitioner was directed to file a reply to the show cause notice within three weeks, and the adjudicating authority was directed to pass a fresh, reasoned order after granting proper opportunity of hearing. The writ petition was allowed. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2178
Up Next

Loading suggestions…