Assessee Cannot Be Denied TDS Credit for Deductor’s Default: ITAT Pune:

Assessee Cannot Be Denied TDS Credit for Deductor’s Default: ITAT Pune

ITAT rules that an assessee cannot be denied TDS credit due to the deductor’s failure to deposit tax, and directs grant of credit with deletion interest.

ITAT Pune Allows TDS Credit Despite Deductor’s Failure

authorVanshika vermadateJan 2, 2026
Last update on Jan 2, 2026
Assessee Cannot Be Denied TDS Credit for Deductor’s Default: ITAT Pune The ITAT Pune held that assessee cannot be denied TDS credit just because the deductor failed to deposit the tax with the government, as the TDS was already deducted from its income. As a result, the tribunal allows the TDS credit and removes the interest, partly allowing the appeal.
ITAT Condones 294-Day Delay, Sets Aside CIT(A) Order for Violation of Natural Justice
Hemant Enterprises has filed the present appeal against the ACIT, Circle-1, Nashik, in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Pune "A" Bench, challenging an order passed by the CIT(A), dated January 22, 2025, for assessment year 2019-20. The assessee is an Association of Persons (AOP). For Assessment Year 2019-20, it filed its income tax return on October 15, 2019, showing an income of Rs 27,841,125, which was later revised on January 16, 2020. The AO/CPC processed the return and issued an intimation order under the Income Tax Act, 1961, on July 10, 2020. While doing so, it did not allow credit for TDS of Rs 27,14,806 claimed by the assessee and also charged interest under 234A for late filing. The assessee then applied for correction of this mistake, but the tax department rejected the request on September 8, 2020, without making any changes.
ITAT Condones 276-Day Delay Due to Paralysis, Orders Fresh Verification of Rs. 26.44 Lakh Addition
Being aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A)/NFAC. However, the CIT(A)/NFAC confirmed the action of the AO/CPC. The assessee further approached ITAT, Pune. During the hearing, AR submitted that the TDS amount is not appearing in Form 26AS because the deductor failed to deposit the deducted tax into the government account. The AR explained that the assessee had already received payment from the deductor, Mumbai WTR Pvt. Ltd., after deduction of TDS. Once tax has been deducted from the payment, it becomes the legal responsibility of the deductor to deposit the same with the government. Therefore, the assessee should not be denied credit for the TDS amount. AR also cited the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Ashok Kumar B. Chowatia vs. JCIT (TDS). On the other hand, DR supported the order of CIT(A)/NFAC.
ITAT Hyderabad Quashes Section 153C Assessment Issued After 22-Month Delay
After considering both the parties, the Tribunal said the assessee should be granted TDS credit of Rs 27,14,806 and set aside the order of CIT(A)/NFAC. The tribunal also directed the AO to grant credit and delete the interest charged under section 234A of the Income Tax Act. As a result, the tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal.

About Author

Vanshika verma

Content Writer

Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1540
Up Next

Loading suggestions…