Distribution of Gift in AGM: Penalty imposed on Company Secretary for violation of Secretarial Standards

The MCA has imposed penalty on Company Secretary for violation of Secretarial Standards in regards to distribution of gift in AGM.

Secretarial Standards

Reetu | Jan 12, 2023 |

Distribution of Gift in AGM: Penalty imposed on Company Secretary for violation of Secretarial Standards

Distribution of Gift in AGM: Penalty imposed on Company Secretary for violation of Secretarial Standards

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs(MCA) has imposed penalty on Company Secretary for violation of Secretarial Standards in regards to distribution of gift in AGM.

Facts about the Case:

As per Sec. 118(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, every company shall observe secretarial standards with respect to general and Board meetings specified by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India constituted under section 3 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 (56 of 1980), and approved as such by the Central Government.

As per Clause 14 of Secretarial Standard – ‘Distribution of Gifts’ – No gifts, gift coupons, or cash in lieu of gifts shall be distributed to the Members at or in connection with the meeting.

Whereas it is observed that the subject company had given SBI card to all 53 minority shareholders based on their requests. Hence, it is affirmed that the subject company has violated the provisions of Sec. 118(10) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with SS-2 in Clause 14 of Secretarial Standard.

An opportunity of being heard was given to the Appellants on 02.11.2022. The Appellants have appeared while reiterating the grounds taken in the appeal had stated that the 54th AGM was conducted on 29.12.2020 via Video Conferencing due to COVID–19 restrictions and was the first time AGM conducted through electronic means. Prior to the aforesaid AGM, refreshments were given to shareholders when attended physically. The company took a humanitarian approach towards shareholders by giving complimentary gift cards in lieu of the above refreshments and neither a malafide intention nor any detrimental interest vested with the Company in dispatching the same and hence prayed for lenient view.

As per the provisions of Section 205 (1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013, one of the functions of the Company Secretary shall be to ensure that the Company complies with the applicable Secretarial Standards. It is observed that the company has a whole-time company secretary appointed to ensure compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2013. A whole-time Company Secretary of a specified company is a KMP in terms of Sec. 203 of the Companies Act, 2013. It is admittedly the primary duty of the Company Secretary to ensure that the General Meetings including AGMs and Board Meetings are held in accordance with law. In the case of M/s. Madras Fertilizers Limited, the Company had issued gift cards in lieu of refreshments to its shareholders at the 54th AGM conducted vide Video Conferencing on 29.12.2020 due to Covid-19 restrictions.

It is the duty of the Company Secretary to take utmost care that the Company complies with all the Secretarial Standards whereas in the instant case, the Company has violated Clause 14 of SS-2 read with Section 118 (10) of the Companies Act, 2013. As such, the Company Secretary alone will be held responsible for the mistake committed. Moreover, when a Company Secretary is appointed, the Managing Director and Whole-time Director can be expected to assume that Company Secretary would take care of compliances with Secretarial Standards and not intervene in those matters. The provisions is Sec. 2(60) also recognizes the Company Secretary who is a KMP as liable for such compliances. In the instant case, the adjudication order suffers from an incurable illegality as the Company, Managing Director and Whole-time Director were held liable to the exclusion of the Company Secretary, who is actually the officer who is in default, therefore, liable to be set aside. Hence, the Penalty imposed on the Company, Managing Director and Whole-time Director is set aside and ROC is directed to initiate necessary action against the Company Secretary alone as sub-section (2) of Section 205 specifically states that the provisions contained in Section 205 shall not affect the duties and functions of the Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Company, Managing Director or Whole-time Director under this Act or any other law for the time being in force.

For Official Order Download PDF Given Below:

 

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Massive Income Tax Raids in Andamans: Tax Official DRI seized 72 Litres of Amphetamine in Major Drug Bust Operation in New Delhi FM Nirmala Sitharaman begins Pre-Budget Consultation with Stakeholders Big Relief to Ajit Pawar as IT Department clears Properties seized in Benami Case Bail against Copper Trader denied in Rs.19 Crore GST Evasion CaseView All Posts