GST Refund: No Limitation Under Section 54(1) for Wrongly Deposited Tax for GSTR 2A-3B Mismatch

High Court Says Voluntary Tax Paid by Mistake Not Time-Barred; Refund Allowed.

Unjust Enrichment Barred: High Court Allows Refund of Erroneous GST

Meetu Kumari | Jun 18, 2025 |

GST Refund: No Limitation Under Section 54(1) for Wrongly Deposited Tax for GSTR 2A-3B Mismatch

GST Refund: No Limitation Under Section 54(1) for Wrongly Deposited Tax for GSTR 2A-3B Mismatch

The assessee, being a manufacturer of textile machinery, mistakenly deposited Rs. 40 lakhs through Form DRC-03 in November 2020 due to a system-generated mismatch between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, which incorrectly suggested excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims. In March 2024, an audit confirmed that there was no actual tax liability. The company then applied for a refund of the amount paid. However, the tax authorities denied the refund request, citing the two-year limitation period prescribed under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act. Aggrieved by the rejection of the claim for refund, the assessee filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court seeking an explanation.

Issue Raised: Whether voluntary tax paid by mistake, without any demand or assessment, is subject to the two-year limitation period prescribed under Section 54(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017.

High Court’s Decision: The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, referring to Joshi Technologies International and Gujarat State Police Housing Corp., and held that such refund claims fall outside the regular limitation and the State cannot unjustly enrich itself under Article 26. The Court explained that the two-year limitation period under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act did not apply because the amount was a mistaken deposit rather than a statutory tax payment. The Court underlined that money paid in error must be returned because keeping such sums without legal justification would be unconstitutional, citing Article 265 of the Constitution and pertinent case law. Therefore, the denial or rejection order was quashed, and the department was directed to refund Rs. 40,00,000 with applicable interest.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Income Tax: ITAT Says Leasehold Improvements Eligible for Depreciation Regional Rural Bank Wins: ITAT Allows 80P Deduction, Declines to Uphold Reassessment Income Tax: ITAT Crushes Section 153C Reassessments Based on Dead Man’s Diary ITAT Slashes Baseless 10% Expense Disallowance to 4% Demonetization Cash Deposits from Prior Withdrawals Can’t Be Taxed Just for Time Gap: ITATView All Posts