ITAT: Interest on Enhanced Land Compensation Taxable as ‘Income from Other Sources’:

ITAT: Interest on Enhanced Land Compensation Taxable as ‘Income from Other Sources’

ITAT confirms that interest received under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act after 2010 is taxable

ITAT Delhi: Interest on Enhanced Land Compensation Taxable After 2010

authorMeetu KumaridateJan 21, 2026
Last update on Jan 21, 2026
ITAT: Interest on Enhanced Land Compensation Taxable as ‘Income from Other Sources’ The assessee, an individual, received interest of ₹82.88 lakh under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land during AY 2018-19. In reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148, the Assessing Officer accepted the assessee’s claim that such interest was exempt under Section 10(37).
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) found that the AO had failed to examine the issue in light of amended statutory provisions and binding judicial precedents, and invoked revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 to set aside the assessment. Issues Raised: Whether interest received on enhanced compensation under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is exempt under Section 10(37) or taxable as “income from other sources” under Section 56(2)(viii) read with Section 145B after the 2010 amendment, and whether the PCIT was justified in invoking Section 263 for lack of proper enquiry. ITAT's Decision: The ITAT dismissed the assessee’s appeal and upheld the PCIT’s revision order. The Tribunal held that post the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 amendments, interest received on compensation or enhanced compensation is expressly taxable as “income from other sources” in the year of receipt under Section 56(2)(viii) read with Section 145B, with a standard 50% deduction under Section 57(iv). It further held that Section 10(37) applies only to compensation and not to interest on compensation.
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
The Tribunal concluded that the AO’s failure to apply the settled legal position rendered the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, justifying action under Section 263. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2165
Up Next

Loading suggestions…