ITAT Sets Aside Rs. 62 Lakh Addition; NRI Not Liable for Missing Tax Notices

ITAT Mumbai set aside the Rs. 62 lakh addition and deleted related penalties after accepting the NRI assessee’s genuine non-receipt of tax notices.

ITAT Deletes Penalties Over Non-Receipt of Notices

Saloni Kumari | Nov 29, 2025 |

ITAT Sets Aside Rs. 62 Lakh Addition; NRI Not Liable for Missing Tax Notices

ITAT Sets Aside Rs. 62 Lakh Addition; NRI Not Liable for Missing Tax Notices

The case had been filed by an NRI (non-resident of India) named Manoj Arjun Nasta before the ITAT Mumbai, challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Department on August 27, 2025, for the assessment year 2016-17. The present case involves three appeals. One appeal was about the income tax addition, and the other two were about penalties.

The tax department made an addition of Rs. 62,00,000 to the income of Manoj as an unexplained investment in a property purchase. Manoj claimed that he is a Non-Resident Indian residing abroad for many years and does not file income tax returns in India, and since he lives abroad, he has never received any tax notices from India from the Income Tax Department during assessment and appeal. He only got to know about the case when he travelled to India after the death of his father.

He also explained that the property investment was made from legal foreign income through banking channels, not from any unaccounted source. However, the tax department imposed penalties on him for not responding to notices under Section 271(1)(b) and for alleged concealment of income under Section 271(1)(c).

When the case was taken before the ITAT Mumbai, the tribunal noted that since Manoj has been a non-resident of India for a long time, it is not reasonable that he did not receive notices. It is not intentional that he did not appear in the hearings; it was due to genuine circumstances. In the interest of justice, he should get a proper chance to present his case.

In the final decision, the tribunal set aside the entire assessment of Rs. 62 lakh addition and remanded the case to the income tax department for fresh consideration. Directed the tax officer to give Major a proper chance of hearing. The tribunal deleted all the penalties imposed under Sections 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c).

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ROC Penalises Director for Incorrect E-form AOC-4 Filing Ten Big Tax Changes Middle-Class Taxpayers May Hope for in Budget 2026 ROC Imposes Penalty on Chinese Director for DIR-3 KYC Non-Compliance ICAI Hosts Draft Bank Branch Auditors’ Panel of CAs/Firms for FY 2025-26 at meficai.org Bombay High Court Grants Major Interim Relief to Insurance Firms in Rs. 10,000 Crore GST Recovery CaseView All Posts