RailTel Receives Rs 49.24 Lakh Penalty, Says No Material Impact on Operations:

RailTel disclosed a Rs 49.24 lakh CGST penalty and confirmed it has filed an appeal, citing no material business impact.
RailTel Faces Rs 49.24 Lakh CGST Penalty

RailTel Receives Rs 49.24 Lakh Penalty, Says No Material Impact on Operations
The RailTel Corporation of India (RCIL), one of India's largest neutral telecom infrastructure providers, recently issued a disclosure, addressed to the stock exchange, regarding receipt of a penalty order.
This disclosure was made by the company under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Through which, the company informed about the receipt of the penalty on January 15, 2026.
The company added that it received a penalty order worth Rs 49.24 lakhs from the Assistant Commissioner, CGST & CX, Itanagar Division.
The company clarified that the matter does not have any material impact on its financial position, operations or other business activities.
The company added that these decisions can be challenged and that they have filed appeals with the appropriate jurisdictional appellate authorities.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1923My Recent Articles
- ICSI Urges MCA to Formally Recognise ‘Deemed Government Companies’ Under Companies Act, 2013
- ICSI Urges MCA to Introduce Time-Bound Refunds for Company, LLP Incorporation Fees After Rejected Applications
- Reassessment Notice by JAO or FAO? ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) Amid Retrospective Validation of Section 148 NoticesPremium
- Vodafone Idea Fined Rs 2 Lakh by TRAI Over Quality-of-Service Lapses
- Yatharth Hospital, Two Subsidiaries Face Rs 47.08 Cr Tax Demand Plus Rs 15.94 Cr Interest; Company to Appeal Orders
Up Next
Loading suggestions…








