RD Deletes penalty of 80Lakhs on holding that company maintained share application money in designated separate bank account:

An Appeal was filed by a company for the violation on the basis of incorrect professional advice under Form GNL-2 . Then the ROC Hyderabad held the company and its director liable for the penalty under section 454(7) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Penalty imposed under Section 454(7) of the Companies Act, 2013

RD Deletes penalty of 80Lakhs on holding that company maintained share application money in designated separate bank account
Digilogic Systems Limited filed an appeal under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, for an alleged violation.
Violation as per ROC Order:
The company has not opened the Separate Bank Account as specified under Section 42(6) of Companies Act, 2013 for the allotment. As stated above there is non-compliance of Section 42(6) of Companies Act, 2013. Below mentioned penalty was imposed on the company as per the provisions of section 42(10) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Company's Submission with RD
The company informed RD that it has passed resolution to keep the amount of the issue in a separate bank account specifying the account. The company has two bank accounts, one for its daily operations and the other was opened earlier for statutory requirements. The company had deposited the amount collected in the said designated account and no other transactions took place from the account till the allotment of shares. Only thereafter the funds were transferred to the bank account used for daily operations and used for business of the company.
The ROC has stated that the company has suo moto came to them by filing GNL-2 and cannot go back again stating that there is no violations.
In this regard, the managing director stated that he is a technical person from the defence sector and he was wrongly advise to file GNL-2 by some professional. However, later on when proper guidance has taken from professionals it was found that there is no violation.
In view of the submissions made and perusal of the bank statement attached to the appeal.
RD deletes penalty
The Competent Authority is of the view that the company has complied with the requirement of law and there is no violation. Hence the order of the ROC Hyderabad is set aside.
Company's Submission with RD
The company informed RD that it has passed resolution to keep the amount of the issue in a separate bank account specifying the account. The company has two bank accounts, one for its daily operations and the other was opened earlier for statutory requirements. The company had deposited the amount collected in the said designated account and no other transactions took place from the account till the allotment of shares. Only thereafter the funds were transferred to the bank account used for daily operations and used for business of the company.
The ROC has stated that the company has suo moto came to them by filing GNL-2 and cannot go back again stating that there is no violations.
In this regard, the managing director stated that he is a technical person from the defence sector and he was wrongly advise to file GNL-2 by some professional. However, later on when proper guidance has taken from professionals it was found that there is no violation.
In view of the submissions made and perusal of the bank statement attached to the appeal.
RD deletes penalty
The Competent Authority is of the view that the company has complied with the requirement of law and there is no violation. Hence the order of the ROC Hyderabad is set aside.My Recent Articles
- ROC Chennai Orders Penalty for delay in filing MGT-17: Short Staff no Excuse
- Penalty Order Passed by ROC Chennai for Non-Disclosure in Form PAS-3
- ROC Imposes Penalty For Non-Compliance In Securities Allotment Filing
- GST: Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Manual Appeal
- From Rs. 275 Crore to Zero: United Breweries Gets Relief in Sales Tax Dispute
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts












