GST Demand Invalid Where Similar Issue Already Withdrawn in Past: HC:

The Patna High Court quashed a Rs 1.03 crore GST demand and directed the refund of recovered amounts, holding that no tax can persist once a similar subsequent assessment is withdrawn.
High Court Quashes Rs 1.03 Crore GST Demand

GST Demand Invalid Where Similar Issue Already Withdrawn in Past: HC
The Patna High Court quashed the GST demand, holding that since a similar later assessment was withdrawn, authorities must refund any recovered amount, ensuring no unjust taxation persists where the issue has already been resolved.
Asma Automobiles Private Limited (petitioner) had filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court, challenging an assessment order dated December 12, 2019, passed by the GST authorities under Section 73 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for the month of October 2019 falling in the Financial Year 2019-20 in Form GST DRC-07. The impugned order had raised an aggregate tax amounting to Rs 1.03 crore (Rs 43.68 lakh each under CGST and SGST, and a cess of Rs 15.94 lakh) on the grounds of non-filing of return in GSTR 3B and payment of tax and late fee within the allowed time limit.
The petitioner argued that he was served with the impugned order only on the GST portal and not by any other mode of service, as prescribed under section 169 of the Act. Ultimately, a huge demand was imposed even though all compliance filings and dues were paid within the permitted time limit. Further claimed that the impugned tax demand is a result of double taxation and is contrary to the principles of the constitution; hence, it should be quashed. Additionally, the company sought a refund of the amount that had been recovered by the authorities.
During the hearing before the High Court, the petitioner informed that court that a later assessment order dated January 12, 2021, passed by the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Purnea Circle, Purnea, relating to the issue has already been withdrawn by the tax authorities and, consequently, the amount collected during the tax proceedings was directed to be refunded back if it had not already been returned.
When the court analysed the case, it held that if a case based on a similar issue has already been withdrawn in the past, then the tax authorities must ensure that the recovered amount is refunded to the petitioner, provided it has not already been credited back.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2703My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restores Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance Dispute Over Alleged Section 194C TDS Failure Premium
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








