ITAT Emphasises Fair Hearing, Gives Assessee Another Chance Before CIT(A):

ITAT set aside the CIT(A)’s delay-based dismissal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, granting the assessee another opportunity.
ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order, Directs Reconsideration
Table of Contents

ITAT Emphasises Fair Hearing, Gives Assessee Another Chance Before CIT(A)
ITAT granted relief to the assessee by giving another opportunity to pursue appeals before the CIT(A).
The present case has been filed by Varsha Dilip Dhruv against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, challenging the separate impugned orders of even date 29/08/2025 passed by CIT(A) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act.
Background of the case
Previously, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee against the separate orders only on the ground of the delay. Being aggrieved by the decision. The assessee approached the ITAT. During the hearing, the AR argued that a detailed affidavit had already been filed explaining the delay. It was also pointed out that in a similar case involving a partnership firm named Dhruv Enterprise, where the taxpayer and her husband are partners, the same CIT(A) had condoned the delay for similar reasons on November 27, 2024. The lawyer argued that since all the appeals were filed around the same time and the delay occurred for identical reasons, the assessee believed that the delay would be condoned in all cases. After considering both sides, the ITAT held that, in the interest of justice, the taxpayer should be given one more opportunity. The Tribunal set aside the earlier orders and sent the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The ITAT also directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the request for condonation of delay and also to examine the earlier order passed in the case of Dhruv Enterprise. The taxpayer has also been directed to update her email address and attend all future hearings without fail. ITAT stated that "No order shall be passed without affording reasonable and adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties". As a result, all the appeals have been allowed for statistical purposes.About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1830My Recent Articles
- ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Condone 46-Day Delay, Restore Appeal for Fresh Decision on MeritsPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Rs 2.35 Crore Disallowance, Directs CIT(A) to Reconsider After TDS AppealPremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 28.49 Lakh Unexplained Income Dispute to AO for Fresh Examination After Assessee Changes Stand on SBI CSP Bank DepositsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief in Rs 8.27 Lakh Unexplained Investment Case, Sends Tax Appeal Back to CIT(A) for Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Sends Rs 28 Crore Tax Addition Back to CIT(A), Directs Fresh Examination of Property Capital Gains and Section 54 ClaimPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts








