ITAT Quashes Reassessment as No Addition Was Made on Original Ground of Reopening:

ITAT Quashes Reassessment as No Addition Was Made on Original Ground of Reopening

ITAT Ahmedabad has held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 can not be continued if there is no addition made on the very issue for which the case was reopened, Tribunal deleted Rs 66.49 lakh addition made under Section 69B

Addition Under Section 69B Deleted as Reassessment Proceedings Invalid

authorSaloni KumaridateMay 28, 2026
Last update on May 28, 2026
ITAT Quashes Reassessment as No Addition Was Made on Original Ground of Reopening The ITAT Ahmedabad has ruled that if no addition is made on the original issue that formed the basis of reopening of assessment, then the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 can not be validated. ITAT deleted the Rs 66.49 lakh addition by holding that the Assessing Officer can not independently assess unrelated income if the ground of jurisdiction has failed.
ITAT Ahmedabad Holds On-Money Receipts from Real Estate Business Taxable as Business Income
The assessee filed her return of income under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act and after a search and seizure operation, the Income Tax Officer (ITO) found out about a cash payment made by the assessee and her co-owner for purchasing a residential unit. On the basis of this information, the AO initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147.
No Additional Sustainable Cash When Deposits Are Properly Recorded in Books: ITAT
The Tribunal observed that the assessee had produced banking logs of her past sale of a residential property and linked it to the subsequent purchasing of the residential unit. The AO has failed to provide any concrete evidence or records to disprove the same. The tribunal further observed that the AO has not been able to make any addition on the very ground of opening of the case, which was the alleged cash 'on-money' transaction.
No Penalty Against Company as ROC Drops Proceedings for Non-Appointment of Independent Directors
Accordingly, the ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid and directed deletion of the addition of Rs. 66.49 lakh made under Section 69B read with Section 115BBE of the Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2403
Up Next

Loading suggestions…