ITAT Quashes Reassessment as No Addition Was Made on Original Ground of Reopening:

ITAT Ahmedabad has held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 can not be continued if there is no addition made on the very issue for which the case was reopened, Tribunal deleted Rs 66.49 lakh addition made under Section 69B
Addition Under Section 69B Deleted as Reassessment Proceedings Invalid

ITAT Quashes Reassessment as No Addition Was Made on Original Ground of Reopening
The ITAT Ahmedabad has ruled that if no addition is made on the original issue that formed the basis of reopening of assessment, then the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 can not be validated. ITAT deleted the Rs 66.49 lakh addition by holding that the Assessing Officer can not independently assess unrelated income if the ground of jurisdiction has failed.
The assessee filed her return of income under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act and after a search and seizure operation, the Income Tax Officer (ITO) found out about a cash payment made by the assessee and her co-owner for purchasing a residential unit. On the basis of this information, the AO initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147.
The Tribunal observed that the assessee had produced banking logs of her past sale of a residential property and linked it to the subsequent purchasing of the residential unit. The AO has failed to provide any concrete evidence or records to disprove the same. The tribunal further observed that the AO has not been able to make any addition on the very ground of opening of the case, which was the alleged cash 'on-money' transaction.
Accordingly, the ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid and directed deletion of the addition of Rs. 66.49 lakh made under Section 69B read with Section 115BBE of the Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2403My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rules Enhanced 60% Tax Under Section 115BBE Cannot Be Applied to AY 2017-18; Directs AO to Levy 30% TaxPremium
- Govt Expands Identity Verification Options for PFMS Users; Now Verify Yourself Using PAN or Bank AccountPremium
- ITAT Allows Section 80IE Deduction, Holds Delayed Form 10CCB Filing as Mere Procedural DefectPremium
- ITAT Condones 842-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Before CIT(A), Holds Justice Cannot Be Denied on Technical GroundsPremium
- MCA Extends Validity of CCFS-2026 Till August 31, 2026; Companies Get More Time for Pending Statutory Filings
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts









