NFRA Issues Circular to Improve Communication Between Auditors and TCWG:

As per the Circular, auditors and those in charge of governance should meet at least twice a year: once before the audit starts and again before approving the financial statements by TCWG.
NFRA Effective Communication Guide Circular

NFRA Issues Circular to Improve Communication Between Auditors and TCWG
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued a circular dated 7th January 2026, to improve communication between the statutory auditors and those charged with governance (TCWG), including Boards of Directors and Audit Committees. The circular applies to all listed companies, some large companies covered under NFRA rules, and their auditors.
The NFRA, during an investigation, noticed some professional misconduct and non-compliances by auditors, which have weakened the corporate governance and audit failures. To solve this, NFRA has reminded the companies and their auditors about the requirements under the Companies Act, 2013 and the standards on Auditing (SAs).
Common Failures Found by NFRA
Here are some common auditor non-compliances as observed by NFRA.
- Incorrect Identification of Audit Committee and Management Executives and Executive Directors as TCWG.
- Auditors did not establish and document the form, timing and two‑way nature of communication with TCWG.
- Incomplete and insufficient documentation of the communication process with TCWG.
- Auditors wrongly treated discussions with the management as communication with TCWG.
- Auditors did not share the weaknesses or the absence of internal controls with TCWG.
- The communication must be in writing, and if the communication is oral, then it should be documented in writing and it must have the date, time and details of the persons engaged in the communication.
- Written communication must be clear and should be unambiguous while specifying the issues for the consideration of both parties. Bullet points or emails with "no response means acceptance" are not acceptable.
- Both the auditors' and TCWG's views must be included in the communication.
- The duration of discussions should be recorded.
About Author

Nidhi
Content Writer
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1832My Recent Articles
- Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing
- Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT
- Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay
- Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata
- Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









