ROC Penalises Company for Not Maintaining a Registered Office Within 30 days of Incorporation:

The ROC levied a Rs 2 lakh penalty on the company and director for not holding a registered office within thirty days of its incorporation and at all times after that.
Company and Director Hit With Rs 2 Lakh Penalty for Violating Section Section 12 of Companies Act

ROC Penalises Company for Not Maintaining a Registered Office Within 30 days of Incorporation
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Patna under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has issued an order no. PO/ADJ/05-2026/PT/02252, dated May 21, 2026, under Section 454 of the Companies Act 2013, announcing the imposition of a penalty amounting to Rs 2 lakh on the company, SHG Mutual Benefits Nidhi Limited and its director named Satish Kumar, for violating Section 12(8) of the Act.
According to the provisions of Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company should possess a registered office capable of receiving and accepting all intimations and notices sent addressing it, and the said requirement is mandatory to be fulfilled within thirty days of its incorporation and at all times after that.
If the aforementioned requirement is not fulfilled, then the default company and directors become liable for penal action under Section 12(8) of the Companies Act, 2013. As per the said section, in such cases, a penalty of Rs 1,000 is imposed on the company and directors in default for every day during which the default continues. However, this amount cannot exceed Rs 1 lakh.
In the present case, an inspection was conducted, where, on July 17, 2025, the concerned Inquiry Officer (IO) had done a physical verification of the disputed company, where it was discovered that the company did not have any registered office at the address registered by it under Section 12 of the Companies Act 2013. This was an explicit contravention of the provisions of Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, the aforesaid penalty was imposed on the disputed company and its director. They have been directed to pay the imposed penalty amount within 90 days of receiving the order and also rectify the default within the same time limit.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2612My Recent Articles
- ROC Penalises Nidhi Company and Five Directors for Failure to Furnish PAN and Email IDs of Allottees in Form PAS-Premium
- SBI Revises Cash Withdrawal Charges on Basic Savings Bank Deposit Accounts; Effective from October 1
- Delhi High Court Allows SC and HC Judges to File or Revise ITR Under New Regime Without Listing Certain AllowancesPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance SheetsPremium
- Substantial Justice Prevails Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 171-Day Delay in Section 54 Exemption Dispute Due to Ill HealthPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…







