An appellate authority forced a "do-over" on a tax case despite the Assessing Officer already having officially verified and accepted the taxpayer's proof of funds
Khushi Jain | Apr 27, 2026 |
Tax Addition Quashed After AO Verified Funds as Legitimate
Fact of the case
The assessee’s case was reopened due to an unexplained investment in an immovable property worth Rs. 67,76,500. The original assessment was completed ex parte under Section 144 of the Act. During subsequent appellate proceedings before the CIT(A), the assessee provided evidence explaining the source of investment. A remand report submitted by the Assessing Officer (AO) on 11.08.2020 explicitly accepted that the source of investment was duly explained. Despite this, the CIT(A) restored the matter to the file of the AO for re-verification.
Issue of the case
Whether the appellate authority was justified in ordering a re-investigation when the assessing officer had already reviewed the evidence and confirmed the source of the investment was legitimate.
Decision of the Tribunal
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found that the issue of investment had already been thoroughly examined by the AO during the remand proceedings, who had confirmed the source was explained. Consequently, the tribunal held that the CIT(A)’s direction to restore the issue for re-verification was unwarranted and unjustified. The ITAT ordered the deletion of the entire addition of Rs. 67,76,500 and allowed the assessee’s appeal.
In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]
Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"