Telangana High Court Grants Bail in Rs 21.89 Crore GST Fraud Case:

The Telangana High Court granted bail to an accused in a Rs 21.89 crore GST ITC fraud case.
Accused Gets Bail from Telangana High Court

Telangana High Court Grants Bail in Rs 21.89 Crore GST Fraud Case
The High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad has granted bail to the petitioner in a GST fraud case.
The present appeal has been filed by Sri Jagadish Upadhyay against the Superintendent of Central Jail and others, seeking to enlarge him on bail.
Background of the case
The case relates to an FIR registered by the Anti-Evasion Wing of the Medchal GST Commissionerate. The authorities alleged that the accused persons fraudulently claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to Rs 21.89 crore by using fake bills. He was arrested on January 28, 2026, and has been in judicial custody since January 29, 2026.
The petitioner's lawyer argued that he is innocent and that the offence is bailable. It was also pointed out that the other accused had already been granted bail by the trial court. The defence submitted that most of the investigation had been completed and that further custody was not required.
However, the Senior Standing Counsel for the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) opposed the bail plea. He argued that the offence falls under non-bailable provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, and that the investigation was still ongoing.
High Court Ruling
After considering the above merits, the High Court observed that the petitioner had been in custody since January 2026 and one of the other accused had already been granted bail. As a result, the Court decided to grant regular bail.
The court directed the petitioner to execute a personal bond of Rs 25,000 with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the special judge for economic offences at Nampally, Hyderabad. He must also appear before the GST authorities every Wednesday at 11:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. until the charge sheet is filed, and thereafter whenever required.
Additionally, he must comply with the conditions specified under Section 480(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
With these directions, the criminal petition was allowed, and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1571My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Gross Profit Cannot Be Estimated Without Rejecting Books of AccountPremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Was Issued Beyond Limitation PeriodPremium
- ITAT Rejects TDS Credit Claim Over Wrong Deductor Name in ITRPremium
- Missed the GST Appeal Deadline? GSTAT Launches Token-Based Filing Facility
- Centre Authorizes Maharashtra to Access Tax Data for Farmer Loan Waiver Scheme
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








